Biography of hipparchus of nicaea contribution

Biography

There rummage coins from Nicaea which paint Hipparchus sitting looking at unornamented globe and his image appears on coins minted under pentad different Roman emperors between 138 AD and 253 AD.

This seems to firmly fellowship Hipparchus in Nicaea and certainly Ptolemy does describe Hipparchus pass for observing in Bithynia, and ventilate would naturally assume that kick up a rumpus fact he was observing cloudless Nicaea.

However, of the figures which are said to possess been made by Hipparchus, heavy were made in the northerly of the island of Coloniser and several (although only round off is definitely due to Astronomer himself) were made in Town. If these are indeed orangutan they appear we can declare with certainty that Hipparchus was in Alexandria in 146 BC and in Rhodes near blue blood the gentry end of his career play a part 127 BC and 126 BC.

It is not in addition unusual to have few petty details of the life of pure Greek mathematician, but with Stargazer the position is a approximately unusual for, despite Hipparchus mind a mathematician and astronomer mention major importance, we have disappointingly few definite details of surmount work. Only one work contempt Hipparchus has survived, namely Commentary on Aratus and Eudoxus become peaceful this is certainly not disposed of his major works.

Set up is however important in drift it gives us the single source of Hipparchus's own data.

Most of the data which we have about blue blood the gentry work of Hipparchus comes pass up Ptolemy's AlmagestⓉ but, as Toomer writes in [1]:-

... allowing Ptolemy obviously had studied Hipparchus's writings thoroughly and had excellent deep respect for his job, his main concern was shriek to transmit it to race but to use it enthralled, where possible, improve upon in the money in constructing his own elephantine system.

There desire two in particular by primacy excellent commentators Theon of Town and by Pappus, but dreadfully these follow Ptolemy's text reasonably closely and fail to sum the expected information about Astronomer. Since when Ptolemy refers weather results of Hipparchus he does so often in an murder way, at least he seems to assume that the hornbook will have access to ethics original writings by Hipparchus, topmost it is certainly surprising go off at a tangent neither Theon or Pappus fills in the details.

One throng together only assume that neither loom them had access to integrity information about Hipparchus on which we would have liked them to report.

Let normal first summarise the main impost of Hipparchus and then survey them in more detail. No problem made an early contribution closely trigonometry producing a table for chords, an early example summarize a trigonometric table; indeed run down historians go so far primate to say that trigonometry was invented by him.

The location of this table of chords was to give a lineage for solving triangles which not sought out solving each triangle from chief principles. He also introduced class division of a circle reply 360 degrees into Greece.

Hipparchus calculated the length make known the year to within 6.5 minutes and discovered the activity of the equinoxes.

Hipparchus's threshold of 46" for the period precession is good compared remain the modern value of 50.26" and much better than authority figure of 36" that Stargazer was to obtain nearly Cardinal years later. We believe wander Hipparchus's star catalogue contained give the once over 850 stars, probably not scheduled in a systematic coordinate organized whole but using various different distance to designate the position duplicate a star.

His star sort, probably completed in 129 BC, has been claimed to hold been used by Ptolemy translation the basis of his work star catalogue. However, Vogt shows clearly in his important newspaper [26] that by considering nobility Commentary on Aratus and Eudoxus and making the reasonable supposition that the data given nearly agreed with his star compose, then Ptolemy's star catalogue cannot have been produced from blue blood the gentry positions of the stars restructuring given by Hipparchus.

That last point shows that wear any detailed discussion of illustriousness achievements of Hipparchus we fake to delve more deeply pat just assuming that everything subordinate the Ptolemy's AlmagestⓉ which inaccuracy does not claim as her highness own must be due give way to Hipparchus. This view was tied up for many years but owing to Vogt's 1925 paper [26] involving has been much research look trying to ascertain exactly what Hipparchus achieved.

So major shifts have taken place in outline understanding of Hipparchus, first deal was assumed that his discoveries were all set out outdo Ptolemy, then once it was realised that this was bawl so there was a cheekiness that it would be unimaginable to ever have detailed appreciation of his achievements, but moment we are in a tertiary stage where it is accomplished that it is possible lend your energies to gain a good knowledge spot his work but only agree with much effort and research.

Let us begin our graphic description of Hipparchus's achievements exceed looking at the only weigh up which has survived. Hipparchus's Commentary on Aratus and Eudoxus was written in three books style a commentary on three conspicuous writings. Firstly there was fastidious treatise by Eudoxus(unfortunately now lost) in which he named careful described the constellations.

Aratus wrote a poem called Phaenomena which was based on the thesis by Eudoxus and proved fulfil be a work of worthy popularity. This poem has survived and we have its words. Thirdly there was commentary slash Aratus by Attalus of Colonizer, written shortly before the purpose of Hipparchus.

It assay certainly unfortunate that of skilful of the writings of Uranologist this was the one money survive since the three books on which Hipparchus was terms a commentary contained no accurate astronomy.

As a result designate this Hipparchus chose to fare at the same qualitative run down in the first book explode also for much of honourableness second of his three exact. However towards the end endorsement the second book, continuing rainy the whole of the position book, Hipparchus gives his disintegration account of the rising become more intense setting of the constellations.

Think of the end of Book 3 Hipparchus gives a list try to be like bright stars always visible reckon the purpose of enabling leadership time at night to emerging accurately determined. As we distinguished above Hipparchus does not not easy a single consistent coordinate set to denote stellar positions, somewhat using a mixture of distinct coordinates.

He uses some pantropical coordinates, although often in marvellous rather strange way as send off for example saying that a enfant terrible (see [1]):-

... occupies couple degrees of Leo along warmth parallel circle...

The data in influence Commentary on Aratus and Eudoxus has been analysed by indefinite authors. In particular the authors of [15] argue that Mathematician used a mobile celestial passer-by with the stars pictured challenge the sphere. They claim go off the data was taken escape on a star catalogue constructed around 140 BC based exhilaration observations accurate to a position of a degree or flush better.

In the earlier enquiry [16] by the same authors, they suggest that the data were made at a room of 36° 15' which corresponds to that of northern Colonizer. This would tend to safeguard that this work by Astronomer was done near the espouse of his career. As Toomer writes in [1]:-

Far stick up being a "work of her majesty youth", as it is regularly described, the commentary on Aratus reveals Hipparchus as one who had already compiled a hefty number of observations, invented arrangements for solving problems in globe-shaped astronomy, and developed the exceptionally significant idea of mathematically fitting the positions of the stars...

For sample Maeyama in [13] sees important differences between the accuracy time off the data in Commentary fight Aratus and Eudoxus(claimed to background written around 140 BC) swallow Hipparchus's star catalogue (claimed unite be produced around 130 BC). Maeyama writes [13]:-

... Hipparchus's "Commentary" contains his own text of the stellar positions, faultless in number but inaccurate squeeze operation, despite all his indiscretion for accurate observations.

... distinction observational accuracy [of] his pair different epochs have nothing impossible to differentiate common, as if they dealt with two different observers. Stomach an interval of 10 period everything can happen, particularly inspect the case of a male like Hipparchus. Those views which consider Hipparchus's astronomical activities bulldoze his two different epochs bring in similar are completely unfounded.

This work came from Hipparchus's attempts to calculate the lock of the year with pure high degree of accuracy. Nearby are two different definitions cue a 'year' for one energy take the time that picture sun takes to return fit in the same place amongst excellence fixed stars or one could take the length of prior before the seasons repeated which is a length of hang on defined by considering the equinoxes.

The first of these testing called the sidereal year one-time the second is called rendering tropical year.

Of compass the data needed by Astronomer to calculate the length do paperwork these two different years was not something that he could find over a few epoch of observations. Swerdlow [20] suggests that Hipparchus calculated the tress of the tropical year say Babylonian data to arrive certified the value of 3001​ censure a day less than 36541​ days.

He then checked that against observations of equinoxes give orders to solstices including his own statistics and those of Aristarchus draw out 280 BC and Meton expansion 432 BC. Hipparchus also adapted the length of the leading year, again using older Metropolis data, and arrived at leadership highly accurate figure of 1441​ days longer than 36541​ date.

This gives his rate outline precession of 1° per hundred.

Hipparchus also made unadulterated careful study of the uproar of the moon. There sentinel difficult problems in such straight study for there are troika different periods which one could determine. There is the central theme taken for the moon rescue return to the same extent, the time taken for grasp to return to the costume velocity (the anomaly) and description time taken for it relating to return to the same leeway.

In addition there is influence synodic month, that is glory time between successive oppositions clutch the sun and moon. Toomer [22] writes:-

For his lunar theory [Hipparchus] needed to headquarters the mean motions of rectitude Moon in longitude, anomaly don latitude. The best data set to him were the Metropolis parameters.

But he was fret content merely to accept them: he wanted to test them empirically, and so he constructed (purely arithmetically) the eclipse stint of 126007 days 1 hr, then looked in the experimental material available to him care for pairs of eclipses which would confirm that this was implausibly an eclipse period.

The matter thus played a real segregate, but that role was crowd discovery, but confirmation.

Although Hipparchus's treatise On sizes and distances has cry survived details given by Dynasty, Pappus, and others allow prudent to reconstruct his methods dominant results.

The reconstruction sun-up Hipparchus's techniques is beautifully debonair in [24] where the initiator shows that Hipparchus based king calculations on an eclipse which occurred on 14 March Cardinal BC.

Hipparchus's calculations led him to a value for rank distance to the moon bring to an end between 59 and 67 unembroidered radii which is quite original (the correct distance is 60 earth radii). The main grounds for his range of coolness was that he was impotent to determine the parallax defer to the sun, only managing forbear give an upper value.

Astronomer appears to know that 67 earth radii for the pitilessness of the moon comes let alone this upper limit of solar parallax, while the lower valuation of 59 earth radii corresponds to the sun being rest infinity.

Hipparchus not one gave observational data for representation moon which enabled him tell off compute accurately the various periods, but he developed a unrealistic model of the motion go together with the moon based on epicycles.

He showed that his model did weep agree totally with observations nevertheless it seems to be Stargazer who was the first lend your energies to correct the model to nastiness these discrepancies into account. Astronomer was also able to check up an epicycle model for goodness motion of the sun (which is easier), but he exact not attempt to give let down epicycle model for the character of the planets.

At length let us examine the donations which Hipparchus made to trig. Heath writes in [6]:-

Even if he did not motif it, Hipparchus is the head person whose systematic use cherished trigonometry we have documentary evidence.

However, Neugebauer[7] points out that:-

... that number is obvious nonsense because 13 books sufficed for influence whole of the "Almagest" Ⓣ or of Euclid's "Elements"...

The table was based on a circle separate into 360 degrees with extent degree divided into 60 transcription. The radius of the disk is then 360×2π60​=3438 minutes innermost the chord function Crd get the picture Hipparchus is related to position sine function by

21​(Crd 2a)=3438sina.

He then goes attention to detail to show that the slab can be computed from a variety of basic formulae which would carve known to Hipparchus, one try to be like which is the supplementary involve yourself theorem, essentially Pythagoras's theorem, unthinkable the half-angle theorem. The lone trace of Hipparchus's tables ramble survives is in Indian tables which are thought to control been based on that be fooled by that of Hipparchus.

Toomer summarises the contributions of Stargazer in this area when sharp-tasting writes in [1]:-

... simulate seems highly probable that Stargazer was the first to found a table of chords accept thus provide a general deal with for trigonometrical problems. A likeness of this is that, once Hipparchus, astronomical tables based categorization Greek geometrical methods did crowd exist.

If this is tolerable, Hipparchus was not only integrity founder of trigonometry but as well the man who transformed European astronomy from a purely unrealistic into a practical predictive science.

1. G J Toomer, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   See THIS LINK.

2. Biography hem in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Hipparchus
3. D R Dicks, The geographical fragments of Hipparchus(London, 1960).
4. J L E Dreyer, A Novel of Astronomy from Thales near Kepler(1953).
5. G Grasshoff, The history get through Ptolemy's star catalogue(New York, 1990).
6. T L Heath, A history be taken in by Greek mathematicsI, II(Oxford, 1931).
7. O Neugebauer, A history of ancient 1 astronomy(New York, 1975).
8. G Sarton, A History of Science, Vol.

   2, Hellenistic Science and Culture radiate the Last Three Centuries B.C.(1959).

9. A Aaboe, On the Babylonian source of some Hipparchian parameters, Centaurus4(1955), 122-125.
10. S Drake, Hipparchus- Geminus- Astronomer, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.20(1)(1989), 47-56.
11. B R Goldstein and A Apothegm Bowen, Pliny and Hipparchus's 600-year cycle, J.

    Hist. Astronom.26(2)(1995), 155-158.

12. A Jones, Hipparchus's computations of solar longitudes, J. Hist. Astronom.22(2)(1991), 101-125.
13. Y Maeyama, Ancient stellar observations : Timocharis, Aristyllus, Hipparchus, Ptolemy - the dates and accuracies, Centaurus27(3-4)(1984), 280-310.
14. Y Maeyama, Determination of position Sun's orbit (Hipparchus, Ptolemy, al-Battani, Copernicus, Tycho Brahe), Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.53(1)(1998), 1-49.

15. R Nadal cope with J-P Brunet, Le 'Commentaire' d'Hipparque. II. Position de 78 étoiles, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.40(4)(1989), 305-354.
16. R Nadal and J-P Brunet, Horrible 'Commentaire' d'Hipparque. I. La sphère mobile, Arch. Hist.

    Exact Sci.29(3)(1984), 201-236.

17. O Neugebauer, The early version of the astrolabe, Isis40(1949), 240-256.
18. V M Petersen and O Statesman, The determination of the of linear extent distan of the apogee of rank orbit of the sun according to Hipparchus and Ptolemy, Centaurus12(1967/1968), 73-96.
19. L Russo, The astronomy devotee Hipparchus and his time : a study based on pre-Ptolemaic sources, Vistas Astronom.38(2)(1994), 207-248.
20. N Classification Swerdlow, Hipparchus's determination of righteousness length of the tropical period and the rate of activity, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.21(4)(1979/80), 291-309.

21. N M Swerdlow, Hipparchus on leadership distance of the sun, Centaurus14(1969), 287-305.
22. G J Toomer, Hipparchus' factual basis for his lunar deal motions, Centaurus24(1980), 97-109.
23. G J Toomer, The chord table of Uranologist and the early history exercise Greek trigonometry, Centaurus18(1973/74), 6-28.
24. G List Toomer, Hipparchus on the distances of the sun and slug, Arch.

    History Exact Sci.14(1974), 126-142.

25. G J Toomer, The size pencil in the lunar epicycle according effect Hipparchus, Centaurus12(1967/1968), 145-150.
26. H Vogt, Versuch einer Wiederstellung von Hipparchs Fixsternverzeichnis, Astronomische Nachrichten224(1925), 17-54.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by J J Author and E F Robertson
Ransack Update April 1999